So, basically, EA has done everything they could to entertain FIFA fans, but what they have been failing to do for the last six years is to integrate better physics and player animations and finally remove those janky movements in order to produce a more realistic-looking football simulator. Unfortunately, EA removed that mode in recent iterations. But EA has added some pretty good modes over the years, including the beloved “Journey” mode that lets players enjoy a football game based on a plot with a proper cinematic theme. The same goes for the FIFA series, which, to be honest, has to use a simple formula (it’s a football simulator, anyway) and there already is little room for improvement. They already look so fantastic and lifelike that developing better-looking games will be harder and harder by the day. Take Cyberpunk 2077, or the Mafia 1 remake for example. But over time, games have become so realistic that developing them even further in terms of graphical or mechanical qualities has become harder and harder. The pace in technical development of video games had to get slower over time it would be pretty unrealistic today to expect video game makers to be able to progress as fast as they could during the 1990s, which was a time that saw a proper switch from 2D to 3D graphics, and every new game set the bar higher. But ever since, there has been no improvement in player movement animations, and whatever physics changes EA promised since then have never lived up to expectations.
#Hard time pc 3d upgrade#
I’m not even getting into the whole charade of FIFA Ultimate Team (FUT) card packs, which converted a proper football game into Texas Hold’em Poker when they were introduced as the new cash cow for EA Sports.įIFA 17 was a game that at least offered a change and warranted an upgrade thanks to its switch from the Ignite to the Frostbite game engine. Same FIFA, different dayĮlectronic Arts is generally notorious for its shady business practices – being recognized as so with the prestigious “Worst Company in America” award, snatching the Golden Poo trophy in 2012.Īnd the company is no different when it comes to its greed for money, which is clear as day when you consider that this is a company that has been selling fundamentally the same game since FIFA 17 – as every next iteration after it used the same game engine, Frostbite, that is heavily criticized for being unsuitable for a football game – for totally exorbitant prices, especially when fluctuating currencies and inflation is concerned in developing economies where football is most popular.
#Hard time pc 3d pro#
The first entries to the series used a 3D-looking isometric view at a time when most football (or as Americans call it, soccer) games were basically comprised of 2D sprites.Īfter the series switched to proper 3D graphics with the “Virtual Stadium” technology of FIFA 96, EA Sports was now sure to dominate the market.īut during those years, every year was a new excitement for football-crazy gamers because every new iteration and every sequel brought new features to the series, employed better graphics and continued to make FIFA better.Įven though it has had a pretty intense rivalry with Konami’s Pro Evolution Soccer (PES) over the years, the FIFA series arguably managed to be the victor in the competition, forcing its rival to first switch to a “Season Update” sales model and then to finally go fully free-to-play with the upcoming eFootball.īut it turns out, FIFA series already have a lesser-known free-to-play version that the company offers in select countries.īut first, let’s roll the tape back a little again. And, of course, there was Captain Tsubasa, which employed a very cinematic and turn-based gameplay system and was also a total blast to play.īut everything changed after EA Sports’ FIFA series. During the Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) times, I loved the Goal series that was hugely popular back then. As a boy that hails from a nation obsessed with football, I have always loved soccer games.